• 제22대 예비후보 선거사무소 위치, 정당( 더불어민주당, 국민의힘, 새로운미래, 개혁신당, 진보당, 무소속)
#> Number of studies: k = 27
#> 
#>                          MD           95%-CI     z  p-value
#> Random effects model 0.0949 [0.0773; 0.1126] 10.54 < 0.0001
#> 
#> Quantifying heterogeneity:
#>  tau^2 = 0.0012 [0.0004; 0.0032]; tau = 0.0354 [0.0209; 0.0566]
#>  I^2 = 57.0% [34.0%; 72.0%]; H = 1.53 [1.23; 1.89]
#> 
#> Test of heterogeneity:
#>      Q d.f. p-value
#>  60.49   26  0.0001
#> 
#> Details on meta-analytical method:
#> - Inverse variance method
#> - Restricted maximum-likelihood estimator for tau^2
#> - Q-Profile method for confidence interval of tau^2 and tau
그래프 
#>                                   MD            95%-CI %W(random)
#> KBS한국리서치                 0.0000 [-0.0595; 0.0595]       10.5
#> 중부일보데일리리서치         -0.0610 [-0.1224; 0.0004]        9.9
#> 인천일보, 경인방송한길리서치  0.0190 [-0.0423; 0.0803]        9.9
#> 동아일보리서치앤리서치        0.0150 [-0.0462; 0.0762]       10.0
#> 경인일보KSOI                  0.0180 [-0.0435; 0.0795]        9.9
#> JTBC메타보이스               -0.0400 [-0.1011; 0.0211]       10.0
#> 기호일보KOPRA                -0.0100 [-0.0713; 0.0513]        9.9
#> 경기일보미디어리서치          0.0110 [-0.0505; 0.0725]        9.9
#> KBC광주방송, UPI뉴스리서치뷰  0.0510 [-0.0108; 0.1128]        9.8
#> KBS한국리서치                -0.0200 [-0.0810; 0.0410]       10.1
#> 
#> Number of studies: k = 10
#> 
#>                           MD            95%-CI     z p-value
#> Random effects model -0.0018 [-0.0217; 0.0181] -0.18  0.8582
#> 
#> Quantifying heterogeneity:
#>  tau^2 < 0.0001 [0.0000; 0.0025]; tau = 0.0075 [0.0000; 0.0502]
#>  I^2 = 6.2% [0.0%; 64.7%]; H = 1.03 [1.00; 1.68]
#> 
#> Test of heterogeneity:
#>     Q d.f. p-value
#>  9.59    9  0.3844
#> 
#> Details on meta-analytical method:
#> - Inverse variance method
#> - Restricted maximum-likelihood estimator for tau^2
#> - Q-Profile method for confidence interval of tau^2 and tau
#> Number of studies: k = 10
#> 
#>                           MD            95%-CI     z p-value
#> Random effects model -0.0018 [-0.0217; 0.0181] -0.18  0.8582
#> 
#> Quantifying heterogeneity:
#>  tau^2 < 0.0001 [0.0000; 0.0025]; tau = 0.0075 [0.0000; 0.0502]
#>  I^2 = 6.2% [0.0%; 64.7%]; H = 1.03 [1.00; 1.68]
#> 
#> Test of heterogeneity:
#>     Q d.f. p-value
#>  9.59    9  0.3844
#> 
#> Details on meta-analytical method:
#> - Inverse variance method
#> - Restricted maximum-likelihood estimator for tau^2
#> - Q-Profile method for confidence interval of tau^2 and tau