#> MD 95%-CI %W(random)
#> KBS한국리서치 0.0000 [-0.0595; 0.0595] 10.5
#> 중부일보데일리리서치 -0.0610 [-0.1224; 0.0004] 9.9
#> 인천일보, 경인방송한길리서치 0.0190 [-0.0423; 0.0803] 9.9
#> 동아일보리서치앤리서치 0.0150 [-0.0462; 0.0762] 10.0
#> 경인일보KSOI 0.0180 [-0.0435; 0.0795] 9.9
#> JTBC메타보이스 -0.0400 [-0.1011; 0.0211] 10.0
#> 기호일보KOPRA -0.0100 [-0.0713; 0.0513] 9.9
#> 경기일보미디어리서치 0.0110 [-0.0505; 0.0725] 9.9
#> KBC광주방송, UPI뉴스리서치뷰 0.0510 [-0.0108; 0.1128] 9.8
#> KBS한국리서치 -0.0200 [-0.0810; 0.0410] 10.1
#>
#> Number of studies: k = 10
#>
#> MD 95%-CI z p-value
#> Random effects model -0.0018 [-0.0217; 0.0181] -0.18 0.8582
#>
#> Quantifying heterogeneity:
#> tau^2 < 0.0001 [0.0000; 0.0025]; tau = 0.0075 [0.0000; 0.0502]
#> I^2 = 6.2% [0.0%; 64.7%]; H = 1.03 [1.00; 1.68]
#>
#> Test of heterogeneity:
#> Q d.f. p-value
#> 9.59 9 0.3844
#>
#> Details on meta-analytical method:
#> - Inverse variance method
#> - Restricted maximum-likelihood estimator for tau^2
#> - Q-Profile method for confidence interval of tau^2 and tau
#> Number of studies: k = 10
#>
#> MD 95%-CI z p-value
#> Random effects model -0.0018 [-0.0217; 0.0181] -0.18 0.8582
#>
#> Quantifying heterogeneity:
#> tau^2 < 0.0001 [0.0000; 0.0025]; tau = 0.0075 [0.0000; 0.0502]
#> I^2 = 6.2% [0.0%; 64.7%]; H = 1.03 [1.00; 1.68]
#>
#> Test of heterogeneity:
#> Q d.f. p-value
#> 9.59 9 0.3844
#>
#> Details on meta-analytical method:
#> - Inverse variance method
#> - Restricted maximum-likelihood estimator for tau^2
#> - Q-Profile method for confidence interval of tau^2 and tau